Rechercher - FNEGE MEDIAS

Unpacking User Adaptation: Technology implementation and usage context in a new coping matrix

Our research investigates how management interventions can facilitate user adaptation to new information technology across implementation stages and usage contexts. Drawing on the Coping Model of User Adaptation, we propose a 2×2 coping framework, showing that tailored interventions—such as training, user participation, feedback handling, and change fairness—differently shape users’ beliefs (perceived usefulness and ease of use) and coping mechanisms. Empirical studies in both mandatory (police officers) and voluntary (university students) settings confirm that communal coping dominates in mandatory contexts while individual coping prevails in voluntary ones. Pre-implementation beliefs strongly influence post-implementation perceptions, and deep usage significantly enhances user performance and satisfaction. The study offers theoretical insights into adaptive processes and practical guidance for managers aiming to improve IT implementation success.

YU Nadia-Yin - NEOMA Business School |

Recherche
Management des Organisations Sociales et Solidaires, Systèmes d'information, Transformation Digitale

03:46

Unpacking User Adaptation: Technology implementation and usage context in a new coping matrix

YU Nadia-Yin - NEOMA Business School |

Recherche
Management des Organisations Sociales et Solidaires, Systèmes d'information, Transformation Digitale

02:26

IA generatives dans l’enseignement superieur en management

Le rapport FNEGE analyse l’impact des IA génératives dans l’enseignement supérieur en management. L’essor rapide d’outils comme ChatGPT et GPT-4 transforme l’apprentissage et le travail des étudiants, qui les adoptent en masse. Cette évolution pose des défis aux enseignants et institutions pour une intégration optimale. Il faut former à un usage responsable, tout en préservant esprit critique et rigueur scientifique. Le rapport propose un état des lieux et des pistes d’action face à ces enjeux.

GOUDEY Alain - NEOMA Business School |

Tendances
Enseignement supérieur de Management, Pédagogie du Management, Transformation Digitale

IA generatives dans l’enseignement superieur en management

GOUDEY Alain - NEOMA Business School |

Tendances
Enseignement supérieur de Management, Pédagogie du Management, Transformation Digitale

Rebooting One’s Professional Work : The Case of French Anesthesiologists Using Hypnosis

Professionals tend to strongly resist breaking from their professions’ core cultural tenets and it is unclear how some may voluntarily break from deeply ingrained views. Through our study of French anesthesiologists who practice hypnosis, we aim to better understand this little-explored phenomenon. Adopting hypnosis, a technique that many anesthesiologists consider subjective, contradicted a core tenet of their profession: the need to only use techniques validated by rigorous scientific-based research. Drawing on interviews and observations, we analyze how these anesthesiologists were able to change their views and reinvent their work. We find that turning inward to oneself (focusing on their own direct experiences of clients) and turning outward to clients (relying on relations with clients) played critical roles in anesthesiologists’ ability to shift their views and adopt hypnosis. Through this process, these anesthesiologists embarked on a voluntary internal transformation, or reboot, whereby they profoundly reassessed their work, onboarded people in adjacent professions to accept their own reinvention, and countered isolation from their peers.

BOURMAULT Nishani - NEOMA Business School |

Recherche
Management du Secteur de la Santé, Théorie des Organisations

04:02

Rebooting One’s Professional Work : The Case of French Anesthesiologists Using Hypnosis

15ème Prix académique de la recherche en management – Prix Syntec Conseil 2024 Professionals tend to strongly resist breaking from their professions’ core cultural tenets and it is unclear how some may voluntarily break from deeply ingrained views. Through our study of French anesthesiologists who practice hypnosis, we aim to better understand this little-explored phenomenon. Adopting hypnosis, a technique that many anesthesiologists consider subjective, contradicted a core tenet of their profession: the need to only use techniques validated by rigorous scientific-based research. Drawing on interviews and observations, we analyze how these anesthesiologists were able to change their views and reinvent their work. We find that turning inward to oneself (focusing on their own direct experiences of clients) and turning outward to clients (relying on relations with clients) played critical roles in anesthesiologists’ ability to shift their views and adopt hypnosis. Through this process, these anesthesiologists embarked on a voluntary internal transformation, or reboot, whereby they profoundly reassessed their work, onboarded people in adjacent professions to accept their own reinvention, and countered isolation from their peers.

BOURMAULT Nishani - NEOMA Business School |

Recherche
Management du Secteur de la Santé, Théorie des Organisations

Qu’est-ce que la neutralité carbone ?

La neutralité carbone désigne un équilibre parfait entre les émissions de CO2 et leur retrait de l'atmosphère, souvent appelé « zéro émissions nettes » (ZEN). Bien que le concept semble simple, il est important de noter qu'il concerne principalement le CO2 mais peut s'étendre à tous les gaz à effet de serre dans une définition plus large, connue sous le nom de « neutralité climatique ». La neutralité carbone peut être mesurée sur différents périmètres, comme une ville, un pays ou une organisation, et peut inclure des émissions directes et indirectes. Il est crucial de différencier la neutralité carbone de la compensation carbone, qui implique de financer des projets pour compenser les émissions. Cependant, la compensation peut détourner l’attention des réductions réelles et est parfois critiquée pour des pratiques de greenwashing. Pour être efficace, la neutralité carbone nécessite des actions substantielles et des transformations structurelles plutôt que de simples compensations financières.