{"id":60605,"date":"2019-03-13T14:38:10","date_gmt":"2019-03-13T13:38:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fnege-medias.fr\/video-acf\/an-analysis-of-the-methodologies-adopted-by-csr-rating-agencies-2\/"},"modified":"2026-03-31T00:15:27","modified_gmt":"2026-03-30T22:15:27","slug":"an-analysis-of-the-methodologies-adopted-by-csr-rating-agencies","status":"publish","type":"video-acf","link":"https:\/\/fnege-medias.fr\/en\/fnege-video\/an-analysis-of-the-methodologies-adopted-by-csr-rating-agencies\/","title":{"rendered":"An Analysis of the Methodologies adopted by CSR Rating Agencies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Based on secondary and primary evidence of their practices, this paper analyses the similarities and differences in the methodologies adopted by CSR rating agencies to assess a firm&#8217;s CSR performance. Evidence of similarities (e.g. the use of environment, social and governance themes, exclusion criteria, adoption of positive criteria, client\/&#8217;customised&#8217; input, quantification), but also several elements of differences emerge, namely in terms of the thresholds for exclusion, transparent vs. confidential approach, industry-specific ratings, and weights for each dimension. Drawing from Sandberg et al.\u2019s (2009) conceptualisations, we tentatively argue that this mixed picture may reflect competing organisational pressures to adopt a differentiation approach at the strategic and practical levels whilst recognising, and incorporating, the \u2018globalising\u2019 tendencies of the CSR business at the terminological levels.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Based on secondary and primary evidence of their practices, this paper analyses the similarities and differences in the methodologies adopted by CSR rating agencies to assess a firm&#8217;s CSR performance. Evidence of similarities (e.g. the use of environment, social and governance themes, exclusion criteria, adoption of positive criteria, client\/&#8217;customised&#8217; input, quantification), but also several elements of differences emerge, namely in terms of the thresholds for exclusion, transparent vs. confidential approach, industry-specific ratings, and weights for each dimension.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":14263,"template":"","format":[11969,11970],"meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"categories":[3143,3035,3148,3032],"tags":[2161,2162,2163,2164,2165],"class_list":["post-60605","video-acf","type-video-acf","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-accounting-and-editing","category-comptabilite-et-audit","category-corporate-and-market-finance","category-finance-dentreprise-et-finance-de-marche","tag-corporatesocialresponsibility","tag-csr","tag-csrratingagencies","tag-sociallyresponsibleinvestment","tag-sri","format-recherche","format-research"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fnege-medias.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/video-acf\/60605","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fnege-medias.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/video-acf"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fnege-medias.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/video-acf"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fnege-medias.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/video-acf\/60605\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fnege-medias.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14263"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fnege-medias.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fnege-medias.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fnege-medias.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60605"},{"taxonomy":"format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fnege-medias.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/format?post=60605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}